Instructionally Precise – Supporting Early Career Teachers

With a dozen draft posts unpublished I thought it was time to ship something.

Here’s a guest post from my colleague Esther Carelse

I love this phrase “Instructionally Precise” from the Toronto induction teacher program.

Jim Strachan has worked hard since 2004 to establish a program that serves the needs of new teachers in the TDSB.

Good idea to tie in teacher support and mentor development with the family of schools model in order to build capacity, relationships and effectiveness.

Renaming “new teacher” to “early career 0-5 years” is a good way to go because so many teachers change teaching roles especially in years of budget deficits.

Side note
Jim’s video presentation on their teacher support will be on the regional mentoring network blog

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Essential Lesson Components

From session with Faye Brownlie.
  1. Essential Question / Learning Intention / Big Idea
  2. Open-ended strategies – for students to connect, process, and transform
  3. Differentiation – choice is built into at least one facet of the learning
  4. Assessment for Learning
  5. Gradual Release of Responsibility

Remember to attend to students!
Can easily focus just on the delivery:)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Twitter Resources

Links for information about Twitter (from @aaronmueller) :

Looking for a quick and easy resource to get you the basics?
Twitter-for-tweeple
Twitter-community
Twitter for Newbies

List of other VSB “tweeps” on my account

Video tutorials from @davidwees

The 60 second elevator pitch

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Hamber Followup

Here are some links to follow up our session on Wed Jan 19th.

Blogs:

https://renomyclass.wordpress.com
https://martensclass.wordpress.com
http://bestlibrary.org/
http://fnoschese.wordpress.com/2010/08/06/the-2-interactive-whiteboard/

Link to the PPT Slideshow on Slideshare:

http://www.slideshare.net/jacobmartens

Links to Unit Plans:

I have posted links to all my Physics 11 and Science 8 Unit Plans. Only the ones dated 2010 have the KUD framework.  They can be viewed/downloaded from this page: https://renomyclass.wordpress.com/unit-plans/

Twitter Resources:

https://renomyclass.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/twitter-resources/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

AfL Session with Faye Brownlie

The following are my notes from the first part of a session Faye facilitated for two hundred Vancouver teachers at the Croatian Centre on Friday November 26th.  Here’s the link to her Powerpoint slides.

Caveat

If you are going to doing something new, you must stop doing something old.

If you are going to do more of this, you must do less of something else.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Building a Foundation for Teaching – My Story

REPOSTED SEPTEMBER 2012

This is an accounting of where I am in my practice, how I got here and where I hope to go.  This is not a how-to but simply my story.   I will use the work I have done in Physics 11 for my examples.  I have done similar work with Science 8, Science 10, and Physics 12 – each are at different points in the process depending on when I was teaching them.

I am not very good at subtleties; I need things to be explicit.  I think this is true of many of our students.  So what follows is my ongoing attempt to be more explicit, both for my benefit and for the benefit of my students.

Early YearsCopyright Matt Chan

My first few years of teaching were those of survival; similar to that of many new teachers.

I relied heavily on the textbook and resources given to me by my more experienced colleagues.

On days when I was organized I gave students an agenda for the day which informed them of what they would be doing; on less organized days they found out as the lesson progressed.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Having a Healthy Digital Life

The pervasiveness of technology is undeniable.  It is also not going to go away.

So… how does one respond?

I would suggest with balance and with boundaries.

Recently I watched this video by David White from Oxford where he explores the idea of being either a resident of or a visitor to the digital world and found his ideas very helpful.  I particularly liked the way he distinguished between our professional and personal identities.  Like him, I am comfortable living part of my professional life in the digital world (hence my use of Twitter and my entry into the world of blogging).  My personal life I do not wish to have on-line and I am intentional about limiting the personal traces I leave.

But I struggle for balance.

The on-line world can be addictive and is leading many to live in a very unhealthy way (particularly with reference to the health of their brains).  The self-imposed limitation of only allowing my professional self to live partially online it still insufficient.

Derek Keenan’s response to a recent CBC documentary on the pervasiveness of digital technology in our society was very helpful to me.  I appreciate his own facing up “…to the fact that I have been far too involved in the always on digital culture…” and that his response is NOT to forget “…the benefits that technology brings us, but I am creating a place on the shelf for it; as technology is not the ‘place’ we think it is, and the place to be, all the time.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

From Rubrics to Letter Grades

In my own practice I am using rubrics more frequently and grades rarely.  One of the challenges that I have encountered is End of Term Reporting.  Our school, like many in our District and in our Province, uses letter grades and percentages for all students grades 8 through to grade 12 (note: percentages are not mandated for grades 8 & 9 by the ministry.)  I am happy to report that this coming fall our administration will not be requiring that teachers report percentages for their grade 8 students.

However, the challenge still remains — how to assign a grade/percentage that accurately communicates a student’s progress to parents.

This fall I will use modified versions of the following two resources: rubric to letter grade conversion and end of term reflection.  These are part of a much larger resource package and a half day presentation I received from a group of teachers at Rockridge Secondary in West Vancouver.  These two documents do NOT stand on their own but I present them as one possible starting point.  Please credit these teachers if you choose to use their resources.

The end of term reflection sheet requires that students reflect upon and own their learning.  The plan for improvement is one of the key pieces in the reflection because this is where the student demonstrates that they know what the next step is in their learning (i.e. what they can do to move their learning forward).  I am not intending to include it with the report card — still thinking that one through.  I think I will use it during parent-teacher conferences.

Last year, I only used the rubric to letter grade conversion (for individual units).  At the end term I looked at both trends and averages.  After reviewing the progress/achievements of  each student during the term, it was reasonably easy to determine the highest letter grade/percentage that I felt I could defend.  This coming fall I intend to also use a version of the end of term reflection sheet and give students the task of “c0-judge”.

I also intend to continue using the personalized comments that BCeSIS allows.  Note: I have enjoyed using BCeSIS at the end of term to enter the grades and comments.

I welcome your comments and feedback.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Sabre-tooth Curriculum

Today I received a link to this 1939 lecture given by J. Abner Peddiwell. 
Very relevant to our times.

In the lecture we learn about an innovative caveman who hits upon a method of improving the lot of his tribe by setting up an educational system.  All is well until the conditions under which they live changes.  The “curriculum” they have been teaching their children becomes irrelevant with the advent of an ice age.  However, reform of the curriculum is resisted by the now established system.

The lecture raises many questions.  Here are a couple I have:

  • What are the skills and knowledge that we need to teach and aren’t at present?
  •  Keeping in mind that teaching & learning is a human activity, what in education (thinking of the art of great teaching) is universal?

The lecture does not address how the children were taught but focuses on what.  Fair enough considering the historical context in which the lecture was given.

I wonder if our challenge in the second decade of this century is to prepare our children (and ourselves) for the changes coming in the next decade and the decade after that.

I wonder if the “how” of teaching & learning is a bigger piece of the change than the “what” (the specific skills and knowledge).

The two are intertwined but we should be able to distinguish them from each other.

Does the “what” leads the “how”.  Traditionally yes.  Still today?

But… if one of the key things we want to teach our students is “how to learn” then the “how” and the “what” are one and the same.  No?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

What does 21st Century Learning Mean?

The phrase “21st Century Learning” seems to be a popular one.  For me it is a bit worrying.  It seems like it could become, if it hasn’t already, a label that can be slapped onto a product or a program to show its currency and relevance.  Note: Google gives almost 12 million results. 

There’s also the phrase “21st Century Skills” which also seems to be getting more popular.  Google gave me less than 2 million results.  On a very simplistic level I could conclude that the Learning is 6x more important than the skills but I don’t think that’s helpful.

Then of course there is “21st Century Technology”.  Here we have 18 million hits.  Technology appears to have pre-eminence over learning and over skills.  Again a very simplistic argument.

Here is the question I want to raise….

What do we mean when we talk about 21st Century Learning?

Are we talking about student ownership of learning? 

  • learners who are active rather passive; who have a sense of agency

About collaboration?  Which is different from cooperation.

About multiple means and modes? 

  • a Universal Design of Learning that accommodates a diversity of learners

About teaching for understanding?

  • with a base of knowledge — but not with knowledge as the end point

Our learning intentions need to have a healthy balance between knowledge, skills, and understanding.  I suggest learning should be guided by essential questions that lead us to enduring understandings.  My UbD influences always bubble out.

Does 21st century learning depend on high-tech? (or can we use low tech to achieve some/many of our intentions)

Nancy Blair gives a thoughtful collection of quotes that I have found helpful.

My hope is that “we” have convergence on the challenges and opportunities of teaching children who are learning & growing is a world that is changing so quickly that it is, in many ways, unfamiliar to many of us.  Yet at the same time, that we recognize that the basic needs of the people have not changed.  My hope is that teachers are supported in becoming 21st learners as they rise with the challenges and opportunities.

My fear is that we walk when we should run — the importance of teachers examining our practice is great; so is our need to collaborate.   My fear is also that we run when we should walk.  Rushing forward with change without first planning carefully and thoughtfully where it is we intend to go.  My fear is that we focus too much on the technological tools and not enough on the learning & teaching tasks that they are meant to serve.

So, what does “21st Century Learning” mean?

Please comment.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments